Press enter after choosing selection

Energy Meter.

Tools - 2002 Home Tools None on shelf 3 requests on 7 copies Community Rating: 4.7 out of 5

Cover image for Energy meter.

Sign in to request

Location & Checkout Length Call Number Checkout Length Item Status
Downtown 1st Floor Tools Shelf
4-week checkout
Home Tools 4-week checkout On Hold Shelf
Downtown 1st Floor Tools Shelf
4-week checkout
Home Tools 4-week checkout Due 02-09-2022
Downtown 1st Floor Tools Shelf
4-week checkout
Home Tools 4-week checkout Due 01-28-2022
Downtown 1st Floor Tools Shelf
4-week checkout
Home Tools 4-week checkout Due 02-06-2022
Downtown 1st Floor Tools Shelf
4-week checkout
Home Tools 4-week checkout Due 01-30-2022
Downtown 1st Floor Tools Shelf
4-week checkout
Home Tools 4-week checkout Due 01-30-2022
Downtown 1st Floor Tools Shelf
4-week checkout
Home Tools 4-week checkout Due 02-19-2022

Cover title: Energy meter, learn to conserve


  • One Kill A Watt Energy Meter




Awesome submitted by mysterio on July 23, 2011, 11:16am Awesome

Interesting submitted by faiyafrower on July 23, 2011, 4:43pm Never knew that the library had stuff like this

AADl is awesome submitted by Dineshster on July 24, 2011, 1:23am They continue to amaze me

Lotta Work submitted by fka83111 on July 24, 2011, 7:33pm Awesome

great resource submitted by Ilyjtwya on July 25, 2011, 8:53am I'm always please by the variety of resources at the AADL.

Nice submitted by Zhengyang1022 on July 26, 2011, 9:50am I' m amazed! you can check out tools?!?

Amazing submitted by adipirro on July 28, 2011, 5:47pm Here is another way the library serves its patrons with free service that helps them learn to conserve energy! Check out the Killawatt and use it to check the amount of electricity your household appliances are using. This item can help you save money on your electricity bill!!

Tools submitted by wzhang1 on July 29, 2011, 8:51pm Wow! I never knew you could check out tools!

Whoa! submitted by 0liviap0pp on July 31, 2011, 3:40pm Whoa! That's weird but really interesting at the same time!!

wooww submitted by Ele Z. on August 3, 2011, 7:01am nice

cool submitted by jakabe on August 4, 2011, 11:22am cool

energy meter submitted by Lea on August 5, 2011, 7:40pm Looking forward to checking out our energy usage. thanks AADL!

I've got it submitted by sara on August 9, 2011, 11:18am Looking for the code, and I had checked it out. Too easy.

wow submitted by Micaela on August 18, 2011, 11:58pm Hilarious, never thought I could borrow this from a library. I'm on queue to borrow this one!

check it out! submitted by betsywil on August 23, 2011, 5:47pm This badge was easy - because I checked this tool out awhile back - because I read about it on a blog post.

The energy meter answered my question. It showed that I own one device which it really does make a difference to unplug when not in use.

Kill-A-Watt single socket meter submitted by gar on December 23, 2012, 12:35pm 121223-1300 EST

I believe most of the AADL single socket energy meters are Kill-A-Watt model P4400. But at some prior time there was available at least one model made by a different manufacturer. This unit was similar in operation to the Kill-A-Watt. The P4400 can be very useful, but if you plan to buy one, then purchase the P4460 Kill-A-Watt EZ which is available for around $30.

Use of two short extension cords with the Kill-A-Watt will make measurements easier. These must be 3-prong cords with #14 wire. I suggest one cord with a straight plug 9 ft long for connection of the Kill-A-Watt to the wall outlet. This is hard to find in #14, but some are available. The straight plug is to ease insertion and removal from the wall outlet. The other cord should have a right angle plug for insertion into the Kill-A-Watt. These are easy to find. A 6 ft length is probably adequate. The total cost for these two cords is probably somewhat greater than $20, but worthwhile for the convenience.

The P4460 EZ compared to the P4400 has more complete and better specifications. The 4400 has a major problem in that a short power interruption will cause a loss of stored data (kWh and elapsed time). The P4460 does not always properly retain data on loss of AC power, but usually works correctly. Why is this stored data important? Suppose you are measuring a freezer or refrigerator. Probably this test should last 2 days to a week. If a power interruption occurred at one or more intermediate time points thru the test when using a P4400, then all data up to the last interruption time would be lost.

If your test will exceed 99 hours, then manually record the start date and time (hours and minutes), and also the end date and time. Convert time into decimal hours, and calculate total test time using decimal time in hours. This is necessary for long tests because Kill-A-Watt stores time in hours with 1 hour resolution after 99 hours and 59 minutes. Even using the Kill-A-Watt internal clock for time less than 100 hours it is necessary to convert its reading to decimal hours to perform calculations from kWh to average kW.

The P4400 is easier to use because any one measurement is selected by a single button press, except two measurements require two presses. The P4460 requires many button presses to select most measurements. But loss of data on power loss, and better resolution are more important criteria than button presses.

The published specifications are:


115 volts ---- operating voltage --- whatever that means.
125 volts ---- maximum voltage --- probably means you should not exceed this value.
15 amperes --- maximum current.
1875 volt-amperes --- incorrectly labeled as maximum power instead of maximum apparent power.


85-125 volts ---- Voltage RMS --- probably means you should not exceed 125 as a maximum value.
15 amperes --- Current RMS --- complains above 15 A.
1875 watts --- Active power --- more typically referred to by the single word "power", or when more clarity is needed by "real power".
1875 volt-amperes --- Apparent power --- because it is simply Vrms * Irms and in an AC circuit may not equal real power.
0 to 1.00 PF --- power factor range --- the definition of PF is PF = Watts / volt-amperes.
0 to 9999 kWh --- energy measurement range --- in kilowatt-hours.
0 to 9999 hours --- cumulative time measurement.

The meter accuracy is quite good for an instrument of this price level and capability. The 0.1 V resolution means you can use this meter in combination with a 1500 W heater to test the quality of the of the installed wiring in your home for bad installation of wiring to sockets. I did not list Kill-A-Watt's accuracy specifications because you need to know how they are defined and that information is not provided.

The next comments are some that I have experimentally determined, and some are deduced.

The 4400 quantizes by 0.1 V, 0.01 A, 1 W, 1 VA, 0.01 PF, 0.01 kWh up thru 99.99 kwh then by 1 kWh, 1 minute up to 99:59 hours and minutes then by 1 hour.

The 4460 quantizes by 0.1 V, 0.01 A, 0.1 W up to 100 W then by 1 W, 0.1 VA up to 100 VA then by 1 Va, 0.01 PF, 0.01 kWh up thru 99.99 kwh then by 1 kWh, 1 minute up to 99:59 hours and minutes then by 1 hour. That the 4460 (newer ones) can and do resolve 0.1 W does not mean that all 4460s can produce good readings from 0 to 2.0 W in 0.1 W increments. One unit I have is fairly good in this region, and another is not. Above about 2 W all four 4460s I have were fairly good.

The Kill-A-Watt instruments do a fairly good job measuring power factor. Whereas a TED system does not (The Energy Detective).

Side note. Never buy a device that is wired to your main panel that claims to save energy by correcting power factor. As a residential customer these are a scam relative to saving you any money on your electric bill.

You need to understand the relationship between power and energy. Power is the derivative of energy with respect to time. And of course energy is the integral of power with respect to time. From the field of mechanics work is energy, and power is the rate of doing work. A 100 W (power) bulb on for 10 hours is 1 kWh (work or energy). What you buy from the power company is energy plus some fees and taxes. Presently averaged over the last year my cost has been about $0.16 / kWh. For normal service your cost per kWh won't be much different than mine.

In the 1930s thru the 1950s electricity in southeastern Michigan was about $0.025 / kWh. From the 30s to the 50s the value of the dollar dropped by about 50%. Thus, the cost of electricity dropped in terms of a constant dollar. The reason was that power plant efficiency increased by going to higher pressure and hotter steam as result of new materials.

If the power of a load is varying with time (could be gradual or on-off), then to determine or measure the energy used over some time period you measure the average power over a short time (short enough that the instantaneous power does not change much during the short time), and multiply by the short time. These measurements and calculations are done for contiguous time elements over some long time period of interest. Then all of these contiguous energy elements are added together to obtain the energy for the time period of interest. The average power over that long time period is the total energy of the period divided by the length of the long time period.

The 4400 and 4460 Kill-A-Watts do this averaging and accumulating process for you using a short time increment of about 1 second. In power mode a new short time average power is measured and displayed every 1 second. In kWh mode the accumulated energy measurement since the last RESET is displayed, and the display is updated each second.

It is interesting to measure the power consumed by a cellphone charger when plugged in, and no cellphone connected. With modern chargers you won't produce any significant reading on a library 4400 Kill-A-Watt. This power level today is probably a fractional watt. Politicians have made a big issue about having you constantly plug and unplug these chargers. This is nonsense and not worth your effort. Suppose this residual power consumption was as high as 1/2 W. Then the wasted energy consumption for one year would be 8766 * 0.5 / 1000 = 4.4 kWh and at $0.16 / kWh the cost per year is $0.70 . Is this saving worth your time, and the wear and tear on the outlet and charger plug? You can save this 4.4 kWh of energy by not leaving a 100 W bulb on for for an unneeded 44 hours. It is far more important to turn off lights and other major power loads went not needed, than to mess with cellphone chargers. The big energy users are where the emphasis should be.

Besides lights some major energy loads are refrigeration equipment (refrigerators, freezers, air-conditioners, and dehumidifiers), furnace blowers, entertainment centers, electric water heaters (change to gas). There are other big power loads, but many are not continuous loads. The less total time that these loads are on the less you need to be concerned.

What can you do with the Kill-A-Watt? Measure loads that do not exceed 15 amperes, and plug into a 120 V wall outlet. You can not measure your furnace blower, yet it might consume about 800 kWh per year or about $128 presently. You won't be able to measure a permanently wired in outdoor flood light, but assume it is on 50% of the year, then the energy consumed is 0.15 * 4383 = 658 kWh or $105 / year.

Most refrigerators or freezers continuously work with an ON cycle of about 20 to 30 minutes and an OFF period of about 30 minutes. Most are plug-in and probably under 500 W when on, except for when auto-defrost powers on.

A freezer is easier to measure because there are fewer door openings and loadings of warm items. If you randomly start a measurement and randomly stop a measurement then you potentially have an error of about 30 minutes in your time measurement based on the above assumption. Ideally you want to start the time and energy measurement from a defined point in the ON-OFF cycle, and stop at the same point N cycles later. Not easy to do. If you want 1% accuracy, then with a random start and stop time you need a test period of 100 * 30 minutes. This is 3000 minutes or 50 hours or 2.08 days. If it is frost free, then probably a longer time is needed. You start an energy measurement and the internal time measurement by operation of the RESET function (button). The RESET zeroes these registers.

A refrigerator will require a longer time because of the many door openings and closings. Most refrigerators are frost free which introduces a high power resistive load at random times. A large variation in food loading and unloading causes additional variations that need to be averaged over a longer time than a freezer..

With cycling loads you want to measure energy used for some known adequately long time period. Then divide the energy (kWh) by the measurement time (decimal hours) to obtain an average kW. Next multiply the average kW by 8766 to get an estimate of the energy (kWh) used per year. What is a decimal hour? It is hours, minutes, and seconds converted to a single hour value. 31 hours, 20 minutes, and 15 seconds is 31.3375 hours.

If you have some device that is continuously on (an AC powered LED clock for example at possibly 1.3 W), then just measure its power consumption and multiply by 8766 hours to get the energy per year. In this example 0.0013 * 8766 = 11.4 kWh / year or about $0.16 * 11.4 = $1.82 per year.

Entertainment centers present a problem with how to minimize residual loads. Many systems probably have devices that requiring some sort of programming or a clock. Turning power off when the system is not needed may cause loss of stored data. Thus, you may need to provide power to some components all the time. Note: the front panel switch on some equipment may not eliminate a residual power load on the wall outlet.

Your computers and entertainment centers may be areas where the Kill-A-Watt can help you reduce energy use. Measurement of refrigerators and freezers may help you decide whether it is worth while to buy new equipment. In all cases make sure that purchase of new equipment will result in performance of the basic function of the equipment that you expect.

If you determine the energy use of your present refrigerator and/or freezer, and then compare this with the advertized value of a new one, then it is necessary to know how the new equipment was tested. For example I run my freezers at an average temperature of 0 F, and at an ambient temperature around the freezer that ranges from possibly a high of 80 F in the summer to 20 F in the winter. The temperature difference between the ambient around the outside and the interior of the freezer is the primary determining factor of the average cooling power.

To make a comparison between your present equipment and an advertized energy use of a new model may be difficult. Only after you replace your present equipment with something new and run your own experiment will you have a good comparison. Suppose on average you could save 100 watts, then this is 877 kWh per year or about $140 / year at $0.16 / kWh.

See my book "Electrical Energy Measurement, Conservation, & Methods to reduce Your Electric Bill", AADL call number 696 Ro.

On page 37 are two plots. is of an old freezer. Note, the duty cycle is less than 50%, and this may be a design criteria to provide faster freezing for a load of room temperature food. is of a fairly recent side-by-side refrigerator-freezer. Here the duty cycle is greater than 50% which reduces the size of the motor and compressor. Not as much need to provide quick cooling as with a freezer only unit.

Both have about the same average power consumption, but different duty cycles. The freezer while running is about 300 W and the refrigerator about 200 W. Note, you can not judge energy consumption over a period, such as a year, by just looking at power consumption at one instant. More information needs to be known about the load and how it varies with time.

1-26-2013 Some data from my freezers. Both are in the garage and I will estimate an ambient temperature of about 20 F over the last two days.

The Amana, in the range of 40 years old, used 3.61 kWh in the last 61.83 hours. Thus, its average power was 58 W and its duty cycle was around 20%. In the summer its average power is more than double. A possible error of 2% to 3% in this power value is likely because the measurement was not synchronized with the freezer cycling period.

My other freezer is somewhat newer and slightly smaller, but it used 4.49 kWh in the same time period. Thus, its average power was about 73 W. Both interior temperatures were about 0 F.


Kill-A-Watt submitted by TheCatMan on June 20, 2015, 11:40pm Absolutely love this gadget. It's surprising to see how much energy something actually takes!

This is very useful submitted by JY 2005 on August 25, 2018, 11:06pm It shows how much energy we actually use! It's a very cool tool to try!

Energy meter submitted by c_zhang on June 19, 2019, 1:22am This tool is so cool!

Super helpful! submitted by BurntSaori on June 29, 2019, 7:10am I love our library, these things are great at diagnosing issues in the house!

Energy Meter submitted by Varshini on July 3, 2019, 3:57pm It shows how much energy we actually use! It's a very cool tool to try!

Energy Meter submitted by KatyaS on July 12, 2019, 12:14am Must have tool in climate crisis.

Wow! submitted by pepemama on May 16, 2020, 9:40am Didn’t expect a library to have one of these. Very cool!

Cover image for Energy meter.

Ann Arbor, MI : Ann Arbor Energy Office, 2002.
Year Published: 2002
Language: English
Format: Tools

Energy conservation.