Cornwell-swift Case

An ophUon was handed down n the Mipirinc coint, Wednesday, rfinnl'DS; (Nrkioii and damages givpn i;i iii.' CornVèil-Slwilt case. ïiic ca ■ was started by the Go-rnwr'.l M'f";. ('-o.. ïonr years ago (igainst !. M. Svv'.it et al. to eompèl the def; ir.lanl.-; to lowpr the flash boards on thedr dani. Tlie defeudantg then eommcncfd a cross-solt to eompel the CornwcllK to remove the dam wlikh they had erected;1 On these suits an alternative verdict was rendered, wliidi lias now been afllrmed by tl:-;1 supreme court. Tiic Cornwell M'f'g Co. was to pay .T. M. S'wifl &Co. $15,500 and thr Aun Arlior A;;ricnltural Co. $5,000 or else remove the dmn it the púlp mili, and the deïiiilaait were allowed to raise the flash-boards on bfoedr dam to four (eet.