Baking Powder Figures

THAT DON'T LIE. The Boyal Baking Powder Co. try to gve the Inference that their powder eontains more t ream Tartar and tlmr its Lcavening Power Is grcater tlian Biiy 01 her made, xs Btated in thelr advertlaement on the "Comparativo Worth of Kakinj: Powtlers," uxhihited by black line. Our name was mentioned in connecturn wil li onè of our cheapcr branda, made of difiVrent materlata as the trade mleht (Iemand. Our Cream Tartar brand of Andrew's Pcarl was oinitted, evldently for a very good reason, judsring trom the relalfve merttt of Andkem's 'Pearl " and the Roynl, as cleaily demonstrated by tlie Government Chemist, Dr. Petek Collher of the Department of Agricultura, at Washington, from samples rece i ved by hiin froua dealers who furu Ulied llie samples trom thelr stocks on Land in open niarkut. Showing excess of Crrnm Tartar in Amlivws' [tn Pfl I I C D C ' AKIAI VOIP LIK. UULLItKb ANALYSIS -v ( s. U. B. Dept of Aghicultüre i . - Washimoto D. C, Maroh 10, issi. f C. E. Andrews & Co. - Gentlemen : I recelved by -w express trom Thoi. Lydon and J. P. II irkins vfc Co , 7" gSa. Gnmd Ave., Mihyankee. and Harper Bros., ChicaI ao, 111, samples of Aiulrews' Peail mul KOyHl UaK 1 I inr Powders. Tlie cans were in goud conditlon J B I wlien reorived and theseals unbroken. I find öpon . - , . mI I nalysla that Andrews Pearl Kaking Powder con1 ¦ t.iins alxiut fonr and a bal. (P) per cent. more E I H I cream lariHr tlian Mie Roy] Bakinj? Puwder, Kl üll I 'ida iroorlioi.atolj larcr peroenlaso I (K I ¦ of f"boiiic aeld ga, and I liud it to Se I q ¦ frec frum aluin, and any iiijurious subI lance. Sincerely yours, PETER COLLIER, '-ï-is; jPP mr [. s. Chemist, Dept. of Ajricul ure. Goraiuf ui Ctefflist Collier's Anslysis as to the Leaveninfí: Qnalities. royal @nmBi No wonder tlie Roya] Co omitted Andrews' Pearl from their " Comparatlve List," as Government Chemist Collier's analysis shows conclusively two things: lst, Tliat Andrew-' Pearl contains nore i'reain Tarlar tlian the Royal, as show n by (he mits ahove; 2d. That the l.in iiiiü; l'ower nf Andrews' Pearl is f reater tlian tlie Royal, as shown by the two black lines above. CHALLEUGE. We will gsve the Royal Co. or any one else $1.000 or 5.000 if thcy can prove by any fair mutual test that Andrews' Pearl Baking Powder does, or ever did, contain nlüin or any injurióos substaiices, and this challenge b ojien forever. Andrews Pearl Biitln? Powder li BUfUlumi br .t f tlTinini auto itsnurityand ülrenglli by the onlv fremiine coininis-ioned Government chemist, such as the Royal Co. liever have published. Tky Iï. C. E. AXDREW & CO., 287, 289 & 291 E. Water St., Milwankee. 45 Michigan Ave., Chicairo.