Baking Powder Figures

THAT DOMTLIE. The Royal Baking Powster Ca try to give the Infcrence tlmt thelr powder coatetas more i rean Tartarand lont its Lcavciiing Poner is ereater than ny 01 her marte, hs Btated In thelr advertlsement on the "Comparativo Worth of Baklnjr Powder, exhlbited by black Unes. name was ménttened In connèctioo wltli oneof our clienppr branda, mude of dilterent materials as the trade mleht demand. Our Creum Tnilar brnnd of Antlrcw' I'earl was oinitred evitlently for a vcry (rood reason, judffhig from Mie rclative mcrils of Asduew's Peaíií. and llie Royal. as cleaily demviistrated by the Government Chemist Dr Peteh Coi.i.iku of the Department of Agrieultiwe. at WaebinfCton, from simples received by hun trom delera who furnUhed the samples from thelr stocks on bami In open market. S howlnp: t'xccss of ('rcüm Tartarln AndreuV F D OOI I ITHP? A LI A I WfMA DR. COLLIERS ANALYSIS i C N U. S. Dept of Aamenruitn i ¦ s ' Washington D. c, March 10, 1883. j C. E. Andrews & Co.- Gentlemen : I reoelved by rr expres from l'hos. Lydon and J. P. HarkinsA-Co A i=g==="--i Grailcl Ave., Milwaukee. and Harper Bros., ChicaLJ Eñl ¦' '" ' -'""lll'" of Andrews' Pearl and Royal Bak_! T B I ln? Powdera Tlie cans were in good condltlon f I wbt'u I't:L'elvei1 1! theseals unbroken. I flnd upon .i ii (0 I ¦ analyste that Andrews' Pearl Baking Powder con m " I ¦ tams aboutfoiir anda halt U%) per cent. uiurc O ¦ 11 ¦ creilm iMUir than the Royal Bakiog Powder, XK ¦ I ui I ndaproiiorilonalcly larger percentaje (Ü a ' :i' '';¦ acid aas and I lind it to be I qI I freefroiii aluin, and uny injiirious iibI Maiiws, 3 j B Sincerely youra, PETER COLLI E P, ïSL-' ' i ídiji' U. S. Chemist, Dept. of Agricul-.ure. 1 ? ¦ GöïeriuiiBiii Cheinist Collier's Analysis as to the Leavening: Qualitles. Andrews' fearl9IBIHBHBBBHBHeVBB8HBS ROYAL OBBBI Xo wonder the Royal Co. omitted Andrews' Pearl from their " Comparative List," as Government Chemist Collier's analysis shows conclusively two thinKs: lst, That Andrews' Pearl con taina more Creaiii Tarlar than the Royal, as shown by the cuts above; 2d, That the Ieavenlng: Power of Andrews' Pearl is greaier than the Royal, as shown by the two blaek lines above. CHALLENGE. We will gsve the Royal Co. or any one else Sl.OOOor .f5,000 if they can prove by any fair mutual test that Andrews' Pearl Baking Powder does, or ever did, eontain aliim or any injurious substances, and this challenge is open forever. Andrews' Pearl Baking Powder 3 sustained by a testimonial as to itspurily and Mrength by the only senu'ne commis?ioned Government chemist, such as the Royal Co. never have publislied. Tky It. C. E. ANDREWS & CO., 287, 289 & 2!)1 E. Water St., Milwaukee. 45 Michigan Ave., Chicago.