Press enter after choosing selection

Baking Powder Figures

Baking Powder Figures image
Parent Issue
Day
9
Month
July
Year
1884
Copyright
Public Domain
OCR Text

TH AT DON'T LIE! The Royal Baking Powdèr Co. try to give tlie tnference tlmt thelr powder contains more ï'rcuin Tarlar aml that its l„cavcniiig Power Is greater than nny 01 lier made, m stated In thelr advertlscment on tlie "Comparativo Worth of Ji.tkinft Powders," exhibited by black line. Our name was mentioned in connpction vPnh one of our cheper brands, made of djfterent materials as tlie trade mlglit (lenituid. Our Creain Tarlur brand of AndrewN l'earl wis oinitted, evidently. for a yery good reason, judging trom the rchilivc merils of Anduew's 'Pkarl" and the Royal, as clearly demonstrared by tlie Government Cliemlst, Dr. Pitbr Coi.ueb of the Department of Agi culture, at Washington, frotn samples received by hini from dealers wlio furnialied the samples iroiii their stocks on iiand In open inarket. IhowlnaeiooMof Cream Trtar InAndrew' VD Ofl I ICDQ' AU Al VCIQ . s Dept of AGKiri'LTURE. I " J C _1 Washington D. C, March 10, 18S3. f ¦ C. E. Andhews & Co.- Gentlemen : I received by 3 from Thos. Lydon and J. P. Harkins & Co., i - % Grand Ave., Milwaukee, and Harper Bros., Cliica ï fío. Hl . samples of Andrews' Pearl and Royal B.ik. W I ¦ inr Powders. The cans were in good condition J g I when received and theseals unbroken. I find upon 4 -, Ui I ¦ analysis that Audiews' Pearl Baking Powder cons tf fc - ¦ taina abontfour anda halt (-ÍJí) Per cent, inore 0 DÉÉHflM 5 E HciTani lartar than the Hoy al Bakinv Powder, ¦ I and a proporiiunatcly larer percentage B ¦ of earbonie acid tía, and I find it to (¦ 9 H qB I free from aluin, and aiiy hijurious siiw;;; . . I I Sincerely youra, m I B PETER COLLIER, IjM '3 ñ? l . S. Chemist, Dept. of Agricul'.iire. Gaimmil CJiemist Collier's Analysis as totheLeavenins: Qnalities. andrews' PEARLïBHBSKHBBMBflfflBWHMWHHS ROYAL ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ No wonder the Royal Co. omitted Andrews' Pearl from their ' Coinparative IL" as Government Chemist Collier's analysis shows conclusively two things: Ist That Andrews' Peurl contains more Crcam Tartar than the Royal, as shówn by the cuts above; 2d, That the Lcavening l'owerof Andrews Pearl bgreater than the lioyal, as shown by the two black lines above. CHALXJ3XTGS. m öi Ty "% uious substances, and tb tl challenge is open forever. Andrews Cl Baking Powder is sustained by a testimonial as to ,ts puntj and slrenglli bytlie only gennlne commissioned Govcniinent chemist, such as the Royal Co.' „ever have published. Tuv It. AKDREWR & co 287, 289 & 291 E. Water St., Milwaukee 45 Michigan Ave., Chicago.

Article

Subjects
Ann Arbor Courier
Old News