Baking Powder Figures

THAT DON'T LIE! The Koyal Baking Powder Co. try to give tlie infereuce tliat tlieir powder contuins more Cream Turftir and that its l. a niny Power is greater than any o her made, hs atated in tlieir advertisement on the " Oomparitive Worth of B.tkinr Powders," exhlbfted by black lines. Our name was tnentioned In connection with one of our cheaper branda, made of difieren! materlals as tlie trade might demand. Our Cream Tarlar brand of AmlrcwN Pvarl was oinitred, evidently for a vry good reason, jiulginjí trom tlie rclalivc mcrils of Andhew's "Pkaim. " and Ine Royal, as cleaily demon strated by the Government Chemisr, Dr. Pbtbb Comjkr of the Department of Agrien I ture, at Washington, from samples reeelrcd by hini froni dealare wlio fnreigbed the samples trom their stocks on iiainl in open maiket. BlKwtn8XceiofCreinTrtrtn Andrews" nn Pfll I IPDQ' A KI A I VOIC --' -v. - U. S. Dept. of Agricvlturk. ) A _ A Washington D. C, March 10, 1883. f ; C. K. AndEBWB & Co.- Gentlemen : I received by jy from Thos. Lydon and J. P. Harkins fc Co., agrr - r- Grand Ave., Mihvankee, and Harper Bros., Chica k,; U go, 111 .samples of Andrews' Pearl and Royal Bak" I 9 inr Powders. The cans were in good condition -J ¦ I wnen reeeived ant) the senls unbroken. I tind upon , CA B I analysis that Andrews' Pearl Baking Powder oon¦ g - I tains about tour and a halt (}4ï) Per cent. more O MEÍBSS i $1 ¦ crcaui larlar tlian the lioyal Bakintr Powder. CíU bil ¦ and a proporlionalcly larffcr pcroentaue I of carboiiic aoltl -:i, and I liml il i he ¦ tree irni aluin, umi aiiy iiijiirioiiti snl:. B stances. &'-' I 5 ¦ Sincerely yours, 11 PETER COLLIER, it $? "53 Jt? U. S. Cliemist, Dept. of Agriculuue. Government ClieiÉt Collier's Análisis as to tlie Leaveniiig Qnalities. anorews' FEARLEBBliHSBSBBHHHHBHBnKS ROYAL WÊÊkWÊÊkWÈkWi Ko wonder the Royal Co. omitted Andrews' Pearl from tlieir ''Comparativo List," as Government Cliemist Collier's analysis shows conclusively two things: lst, Tliat Andrews' Pearl oontains more Cream Tarlar than the Royal, as shown by tlie euta above; 2d, That the l.a n i n i: Power of Andrews Pearl is grealer than tlie Royal, as shown by the two black lines above. ¦ ¦ "TT ATT "B1 WTT We will gsve the Royal Co. or any one else $1.000 or $5,000 if they can prove by any fair mutual test that Andrews' Pearl Baking Powder does, or ever did, contata ahim or any injurious substances, and this challenge is open forever. Andrews' Pearl Bakiñg Powdt-r is sustained by a testimonial asto itspurit) and trenglli by tlie only genuine commissloneu Government cliemist, sucli as the Royal Co. nevcr have publishud. Ti:v Ir. C. E. AXDRGWÜ & CO., 287, 289 & 291 E. Water St, Mihvankee. 45 Michigan Ave., Chicago.