Baking Powder Figures

i THATDON'TLIES The Royal Baklng Powder Co. try to jrive the Inference thttt thelr powder cont ains more Creain Tartar aiul tlint ils Lcavciiiiig Power Ís greater tlmn nny oilier mude, as stated in thelr advertlsernent on the " Comparativo Wortb of Baklnf Powders," exhibited by black linea. Onr name was mentioned in conueci ion wii i one of our cheaper brande, made of dtSerent nmterlalf! as the fraile mlght demand. Our Crcain Tartar brand of Andrew's Pearl was omitted, evidently for a verv jrood reaaon, judging from the relativc incrils of Anduew's " Pea.RL " and the Royal. as clearly denionstrated b}r the Government Chemlst, Dr. PaTBK CoIjLHR of the Department of Agricultura, at Wiishinjrton, from samples reccivi'd by hlui froui dealers who fnrnished the sample.-; from their stocks on Land In open markut. 1 howln excess of Crcurn Trtar 'tn Andrews' flD Pfll I IPRC' ü fti A I VCSO U. S. Dkpt of Agricilture. I - __ Washington D. C, Maroh 10, 1888. ( C. K. Andrews & Oo. - Gentlemen : I received by fromThoe. Lydon and J. V. Harkins&Co., - - - Grand Ave., Milwaukee, and Harper Bros., Cliica StS, wJiSB ""' '" ' s;""lll(' "' Andrews' Pearl and Royal Bak¦ W I I in Powders. The cans were in good conditlon J B ¦wnenreoelved and theseah nnbroken. Ifindupon 4 ' CO I I snalysis tliat Andrews' Pearl Uaking Powder con iS fe ? I I tains about foumiid n hall (4'i) per cent, inore Q BS I crcain lartar tiian the Koyul Baldsg Powder, 5B u B Band a proporilsnately larger percentage ¦ of oarbonic acil yus, antl 1 fine! it to he I l'ree f 'rom aliim, aiul any tnjnrtons uU I I nancea. I 'I Sincerely yonrs, 11 PETER COLLIER, ..'. P ¦¦¦ U. S. Chemist, Dept. of Agi-iculim-e. Gúimwl demist Collier's Analysis as to tke Leaveniiig Qnalitles. andrews' PEARiMBÊÊtÊÊÊÊÊMÊBÊBÊBIÊBBBBÊÊÊÊÊÊ royal HBBHBHHS No wonder the Royal Co. omitted Andrews" Pearl from thelr ' Comparativo List," as Government Chemist Collier's analysis shows conclnsively two things: lst, Tliat Andrews' Pearl contains more Creain Tartar tlian the Royal, as sliown by the cute above; 2d, Tliat the L,cavenlii Power oí Andrews' Pearl s greater than the Royal, as shown by the two black lines above. CHALLE1TCE. We will gsve thc Royal Co. or any one else 1.000 or S3.000 if they can prove by any fair mutual test that"Andrews' Pearl Baklng Powder does, or ever did, eontuin aliim or any injurious substances, and this challenge u opea forevar. Andrews' Pearl Baking Powder ia snstained by a testimonial asto itspiirily anl Strengtb by the only germine cominissioned Government chemlst, sueh as ihe Royal Co. liever have published. Trt It. C. JE. ANDREWS & CO., 287, 289 & 291 E. Water St., Milwaukee. 45 Michigan Ave., Chicago.