Press enter after choosing selection

Baking Powder Figures

Baking Powder Figures image
Parent Issue
Day
10
Month
December
Year
1884
Copyright
Public Domain
OCR Text

THATDONTLIE! The Royal Raking Powder Co. try to fr'ive the nference that their powder cont aiiis more Creuni Tarlar and ttaut its Leavenin;; Power Is reatar than any oi her made, as stated in tlieir advertisenient on the " Coinparative Worth of B.iklns Powders," exhibited by blaok Unes. Our name was mentioned in connpct ion with one of our oheaper brands, made of different materials as the trade miglit lein:ind. Our Creain Tarlar brand of Andrew's Pearl was omitted, evidently tor a vcry fjood reasou, Jtuljging trom the rt'lallve merits of Andrew's Peaiu, " and the Royal, as cleaily demonstra ted by the Government Chemlst, Dr. Peteu Cou.iku of the Departmeni of Agriculture. at Washington, fi-om samples eceived by hltn Froiii dealers who furnished the samples from their stocks on iiand in open market. wiiiKfxoossof Cmnn T:ii uir n Amlrvs' " R Pfll I ICRC' A KI A I YQIQ PcaH over Roral, aaceftalncd by GovUil. UULLILFlO MlinUlOIO erament CBeinlsi Corner. r. . U. S. Pept. of Aorioulture. i TT. j C J Washington D. C, March 1Í 1888. f " C. E. Andrews fc Co. - Gentlemen : I received by T fromThos. Lydon and J. P. Harkins&Co", Grand Ave., Milwaukee. and HarperBros., Chica "" '-- uo, III , samples of Audrews' Pearl and Royal BakW ¦ ¦ injr Powders. The cans were' n good condition IL I ¦ wherj reei'lved and tlieseals unbroken. 1 find jjpon (A I I analysis th.it Andrews' Pearl Baking Powder con g I tatns Hbout foíir nnd a halt (4) per cent. more q I $ S ¦ creBBI larlar than the Koyal Baking Powder, m I and a proporiionalvly lar$;ei percentage jw E 9 of earbonlc aoll val, and I lincl it to lc ':.- I qI I frec trom aluin, and any Injurious ubI I Sincerely yours, I I PETER COLTJER, 't ' "' 3fc 9' U. S. Chemist, Dept. of Agriculture. Gowiinient Cbemist Collier's Analysis as to the Leayemne Qnalities. andrews' ppARLBBBBMHHBBHBKBBBBBSiaffl royal HHHHBHÉHESB No woiKler the Royal Co. omitted Andrews' Pearl from their " Coinparative List," as Government Ciieinist Collier's analysis sliows conclusively two things: lst That Añdrewí' Pearl contatos more Cream Tartar than the Koyal, as shöwu by the ruis abmr; 2d, That the l.eaveiiing Power of Andrews Pearl is grenirr Ümn the Koyal, is ahown by tho two bluck. lini-s ibove. CHALLE1TCB. We will ve the Royal Co. or Hny one else $1.000 or $5,000 If they can prove by anv fair mutual test that Andrews' Pearl Baking Powder does, or ever did, contain aliim or any tuiurious substances, and this challenge is open forever. Andrews Pearl BaUhg Powder is sustained by a testimonial as to itspurity and streiigtll by the only g-enuine coininisioned Government ehemist, sueh as the Royal Co. „everhavepubüshed. Tav It. ANDREWS & CO., 287, 289 & 201 E. Water St, Milwaukee. 45 Michigan Ave.. Chicago.

Article

Subjects
Ann Arbor Courier
Old News