Press enter after choosing selection

Nader, Lappe' Dellums, Speak At Food Day 1975

Nader, Lappe' Dellums, Speak At Food Day 1975 image
Parent Issue
Day
28
Month
March
Year
1975
OCR Text

Food Day 1 075 stretched over a wliole week (March 101 5) in Ann Arbor, puiling in a range of celebrities to talk. about everything from nutrition and organizing food coops to the problems of world hunger. Speakers included SUCh notables as Ralph Nader, radical Congressman Ronald Dellums, and nutritionisi FrancesLappe, author of Dief for a Small I'lanct. Based on the fcarth Day concept which launched the ecology movement in Ann Arbor several years ago, Food Day 1975 was structured to raisc mass consciousness over the vital issues of food production and consuniption. With growing international at tent ion on the hungry people of the world, food is becoming a politica! focus for the '70's. The idea of a day to focus national attention on food was the brainchild of Michael Shapiro, a membei of the Washington based broup, Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSP1). Shapiro first became interested in the subject while doing research on food additives for Ralph Nader. "Food turns out to be a good issue," commented Shapiro. "People are basically interested, and it gets into the other issues of energy and environment." Shapiro was not alone in inging activism. Ralph Nader, who drew the largest crowds and most appreciative response of the whole week, concentrated his attack on monopolism in the food industry. He urged consumers to form cooperatives for building a power base against corporate practices, which have led to high prices and poor quality foods. "Did you know one company controls 90 percent of the soup business?" Nader asked. "And l'll bet I don'tjiave tb teil you which one. Heinz does most of the rest." Nader slammed food advertising, which concentrates on the superficial aspects of food, appealing to the senses only, at the cost of nutrition in food products. For example. Wonder Bread, brought to you by International Telephone and Telegraph (ITT), has two smiling loaves telling you what counts is how soft and fresh they are. Softness in bread has come at the expense of weight, and protein. "The average worker spends hours earning money to buy food," he pointed out, "but how many hours does he or she spendtearning to buy food? The schools prepare people for the product.on end of the economy,not the consumerend." Nader went on to attack the lack of government interest in reguiating the food industry , primarily because in Washington there is a ment of Agribusiness rather than a department of Agricultüre. „ .. r ï.i raii,,,,-,c aio-, wpnt intd the unholv relatioiisiup befween government and the food industry. "Food can be seen as a symptom of a system that radically needs to be changed," Dellums argües. "This society needs to be questioned very seriously." Dellums urged the small predominantly student audience to organize "against the maintenance man of the status quo on the , right and knee-herk liberáis on the left." - "Everyone oppressed has a right to be tree, said Ueliums. "As long as any group is niggerized, no one is free. We need to find places around which masses of people can organize. In contrast, Francés Lappe was not urging mass-based organizing, but urged individuals to look to their personal lives. She asked people to consider the effects of what they were eating both on health and world hunger, pointing to the massive meat consumption in this country. y Simple changes in diet could have mass effects. The question which now remains alter the week of activities is whether t'ood can become the rallying point of the seventies. The American technology ot food has led to spiraling consumer prices, declining nutritional value in processed foods, increasing control over this vital área by fewer and fewer j corporations, and less and less people being adequately fed by the food produced. In fact, American corporations are increasingly moving into the international market, with Coca-Cola now topping all beverages except water. "You were taught since kindergarten that technological change was good. But in the next decades, the debate over technology and progress will increase," Nader predicted. "Instead, we will be looking at smaller technologies and political centralization.