Connecticut

The clection in this State shows that the influence of the Liberty party is steadily on the gai. Tlie Freeman eays: "As the Liberty and fcnttcring votes nmoiint to nearly 2000 agnin it is presumed no election of the State Ticket !ias been made by the people. Tfi'e Whigs Jiavc only 5 Senators, viz. frotn Districts No. I, 4, 5, 12 and 15. - If wlien they were in power, they had repealed the pluraiity rule, there would have been no choice in several of the other Dntrict3, nor of three Members of Congress. The House of Representan ves is more nearly balanced than Inst. year. On a second trial, the Liberty Party havo prevented á clioice of represuntntivcs in Norwich and of a second in New London." As the ''dying avayM argument te greatly relied upon by our opponents, ue subjoin the reeult of the elcction ui a few towns, as compared with last yeur. 1842. 1843. Galn. Farmingfon, 36 59 23 Southington, 12 21 0 Wethersfield, 9 11 5 Guilford, 53 G4 11 Madison, 8 22 14 Newtown, 3 10 7 Nor walk, 14 32 18 Norwicli, 40 74 34 Bozrnh, 1 1) 8 Frnnklin, 3 12 9 Lebnnon, 11 &4 23 Lisbon, 5 13 7 Montville, 14 24 10 Torinnfton, 24 Sö 11 Chester, 16 25 9 Weatbrook, S2 S3 1 Ashforti, 15 57 42 Chaplin, 1 11 10 Hampton, l 27 26 Külingly, 0 li 12 Pomfret, 7 28 21 Thompson, 0 57 57 Windlmm, 25 G7 32 "Woodatock, 23 116 93Total, S54 8íü 493 The Whigs foolUhly threw awny upwards if 23,000 votes. We say fnolishly, because they fuüed of electing most of llieir candidatos, ■and by pi-rsistÍHg in running1 a tliird ticket, placed their worst enemies, the Locos, in power. Had they voted íbr the Liberty candiílidates, the Demócrata would have been r]efeated, and t!ie State redeemed. B..t tleir inlaJuatioi) sfems incurab'e. ín tixteen towns no choice of Represcntatives was eíibcted. ín Woodstcck, every fifilí voter is a Liberty man, the vote standing for Cíillette 116, Cleaveland 217, Bald.vin 204. - In Farmington one of the Liberty Represetitatives waa elected and one Democrat.