Press enter after choosing selection

The Circuit Court

The Circuit Court image
Parent Issue
Day
13
Month
July
Year
1877
Copyright
Public Domain
OCR Text

The following is the dispositioii of oases iii the Circuit Coart ainoe our last report : ISSUES OP F ACT. In the matter of the appeal of Sarah C Schermerhoni trom the decisión of the commiasiouers on the estáte of Frederick Basom deceased, disallowing her claim against sak estáte; jury trial; verdict for appellee for $1,000 ; judgment entered for amount of verdict; defeudants granted 60 days in which to filej and sottle bill of exceptions, and all proceediugs orderod stayed for that length of time. Lizzie Traver vs. Nathan Webb; slauder; jury trial ; verdict, " no cause of actiou ;" plaintilt granted 60 days in which to file and eattlo bill of exceptions. Anna Barbara Pfoifle ts. Fredk. Kirn and Frauk ltuck ; judgment entered for amount of verdict. Hair, Bliven & Moad Manufacturing Co. vs. Lewis H. and John Weir ; order entered dismissing the suit. In the matter of the appeal of Harriet Ostrander and Sarah E. Tenney from the decisión oí the Judge of Probate of Washtenaw County ; judgment by agreeinent for Ï978. OHANOKBY. Harriet J. Augustus ts. George Augustus; decree of divorce granted. Rebecca Sumner vs. Welcomb B. Sumner; decree oí divoice granted. Charlotte E. Jackson vs. Alexander Jackson ; decree of divorce granted. Wm. and Emeline Muir vs. John and Mary Meyers ; decree granted for $793.63. Albert Blaess vs. Frederika Qerner et ai; decree granted for 13,420. Elisha Jones vs. Mortimer Koot ; writ of assistance granted. Leonard Vaughn vs. Hannah E. and Samuel Bay ; decree oï ioroclosure granted for $4,014. THE LABOBATOKY BUIT. In the laboratory defalcation suit the direct examiuation of Dr. Ilose, commenced on the af ternoon of Thursday, July 5, was continued during Friday, Saturday (until 11 a. m ), and concluded Tuesday forenoon, - the Court adjourning over at 11 o'clock Saturday to 9 o'clock Tuesday morning. The cross-examination of Dr. Rose was commenced on Tuesday, at 11 1-2 a, m., and is still in progress. It may be concluded to-day. The publication of the testimony in full ia simply impossible, no abstract would do the witness justice, and running comments and conclusions of our own would be improper. Suflice it to say that all the parties in immediate interest seem to be satisfled wilh the developments so far made.

Article

Subjects
Old News
Michigan Argus