Press enter after choosing selection

Royal Baking Powder Co.

Royal Baking Powder Co. image
Parent Issue
Day
5
Month
February
Year
1896
Copyright
Public Domain
OCR Text

i ' 1 GoodWoman, I just think a I moment. j (& r?IGURES and facts are serious things, but it L is necessary to consider them. gj Royal Baking Powder ís shown by the U. S. { 8 Government tests to yield 160.6 cubic inches of 05 leavening gas per oz. í pg The alum powders were shown to yield about w 60 cubic inches. Is it not economy to use the Royal, eyen Sjj though the alum powders do cost but half as gg much? 18 Again, Royal is a pure cream of tartar baking ma powder, recommended by health officers and jH physicians generally because of the healthful S K]$ qualities it actually imparts to the food. $ H Alum baking powders are condemned by wí sicians and boards of health as unwholesome. jra Their continued use will eventually cause serious a Cg digestive troubles. W Therefore, cost aside, is it not imperative, the j actual wholesomeness of the food being at stake, ' g ÖA that you should stubbornly reject the injurious a 8 and employ the healthful agent ? a 5 Whenever baking powders are sold, $ p either wholesale or retail, at a lower price i than "Royal," reject them. They are p almost invariably made f rom alum, and s therefore inferior and dangerous to health. Sa There is both health and economy in the use gL of the Royal Baking Powder. a 106 WALU ST., NEW-YORK.

Article

Subjects
Old News
Ann Arbor Courier