Is Suekey Innocent?

"Do j-om know," sa.ikl a prominent ciitizen to the wriiter a Uay or two sínco, "I 'do not beldeve Buekey ever took one cent írom tilue county of Wadbfteuaw tlmt rtM not beüong to luhii 1" "IIow oouM Muat be ?" was RSkeC. "Very easiCy, juo doubt . Now I have giaoíd reason for sayiilug klus, but I am jnot at yberty feo dh-ulge wliat I know. But I -vn'.l aay tute to you, tliiat Mr. Suekey has bee.11 made to suffer for 'Une nasoa'Jiity of anothcr person, am'd I ba'Jieve tiluat to time tiho truth -vvílI b3 kmown and the stiaiLu lakeni íi-om hB good name and placed w.foere Ib belomgs. This I know fe a starUimg aasertian, but I bcjU've !t MO be fc:pue ai3 I believe the eartili revoives upota i.s axlí3." "Ií suoh a tbtaig mfos tme, why did not Mr. Buekey, not only for bla owu g.pod name, but the Bake oí liís -n-.ife aiwl cbUdrav. tnake ib known Ucn he was aecused ?" was asked. "In the ttrst Dítuce he did no deretiamï fbuaimasa aïfairs, and the accouaiUs IkivLu.ü' beooane mixed he cou'd not 'pi'OTce liiiis innocwice, anti 'tt is iiis oatuire to suffer anytlilling rather than 'gqueaC,' as it is termed. But I be'Jiieve time wiil prove hU lnmocence of aiiy "wronig doiing." Thie geurtaeimam "who made these verolairks is a man in 110 way reClate.di or oomniected w.iith Slr. Buokcy, and could havie no miotive lor makfeng sucJi au nssertúou if he did no't belleve it. He seems to fe-el certaiw. that the re will be somi' iwiííiWio'iis made in ':he futaire tluit wSU Jrtng to light tlie real cuïprit. The suspxion Ís prevaisiii that the oouiity's maney went into the hands of tivo g-aml'l' ra, ana iwv;v h lpo.l ihü one -vlo vrongi'iï'-ly took iit. If Mr. Sukey oam cstalxiisli liis inniocence 'there wildl be m;i.ny who wlU be g-j'ad of it.