Mr. Daily's Case

To the Editor of The Registkr: mr:-Nh ii at U H B. Daily has reoovered from smal!-pox, been discharged, mi reurnej homp, 1 wish to correct a lew htatementa tha' have been made conc rning him. lat. 'That Mr. D. knew he had been exposeil (-■ nnHllpox and then ■ ani ■ to Anti Arh r." This statement is falxe ; he hd nu knowleiige of exposure, he hnppened to bf in Lyonf, N. T., where here wre a luw cases, but did not go within half a mile ot hcuses containing -tiiHU-poz patients; he was vaccmated : ile there ihere wtre thse few ■i.st-8 in the citv ; for ihe same re"8on that ma y in A, A. Iihw been recently vaccir.l. His 6rst knowledge of exposure ame vii h the dipse. 2nd. It ha been taleci thai it wa a case of "mistaken diig." Th s statement al-o is false; (íianosÍ8 fri m the first was, mild case of imll pox (vriokii(1) and tbere oc■ ■uired nu reancui lor cliaug'np it. As atei.iiing physician, I had oportunities to know ihr.t ihe bord of healtn tiid all ■lia could be done to prevent gpreading t diseae and to make Mr. Daly comf jrsble. Tne good resulis in both cases -prak for themselve. Respecfully vours AnnArbor Mich F b 11, 1889.