A Partial Difference

An Evening News article headed, "Students' Strike," sets forth rebelIion among the post-graduate laws, and that Prof. Mechem has given the men more work than they can attend to8 and adds: "An indignation meeting was held and resolutions were passed that until the professor coniïned himself to the limits of reason his lessons would be bolted," and that "One : of the prominent lecturers is back j of the boys, and the chances are i good for a lively row." It 1 eludes by stating that M. S. Clawson ! has been appointed chairman "to, advance the boys' grievances and see that Mechem has no one present ' at his lectures until the demands j are satisfied." This brings the said M. S. Clawson out in a communication in the U. of M. Daily with a statement by which it appears that the News is correct except in slight particulars, as follows: That no such rebellion has been even thought of. No such indignation meeting has been held. No such resolutions have been I passed. No prominent lecturer is "back of the boys." The chances are not good for a lively row, nor have I been appointed to "see that Mechem has no one present at his lectures until the demands are satisfied." It appears from this that the News is all right except as to one feature of its article, viz., that it is not so.