Baking Powder Figures

THAT DON'T LIE! ¦ ¦ The Roya] Baking Powder Co. try to gvo the inference that their powder eo'itatnsmore reiim Tarlar and that lts Leaveulng Power Is (treater tbao ;iny o'her made h? stated in their adrerttsetuent on the " Cotnparatlve Wortli of Rükinjr Powders," exhibited by black linee. Our name was mentloiied in connection with one of our cbenper branda, mudo of diflerent material!) astlie trade mieht demttnd. Our Cream la il ar brand of Andrew'l Pearl was omitted evlilently tor a ver Rood reason, judirinjr frona the relallve merlls of Andbbw'b Prakt, '" and the lloyal. as clearly (iem'ingtrHted by the Government Cheraiar, Dr Peteu Colubb of tlie Department of Agrloulture, at Washington, froin samples eceived by him trom dealera wlio furnislied the samples trom their stocks on hand in open miii'ket. ving excett of Crcam Tartsr In Andrews' fD OOI ITDP' A KI Al V(Mn jaüpa&íaá, tULLIERS ANALYSIS s - ,-- n. U. s. Dept of Aghtltui;k i . ' K_. A Washington D. C, Marcb 10, 1888. ( C. E. Ahdbbws & Co.- Gentlemen : I recelved by pxpres frona l'hos. Lydon and J. P. Hurklns&Go., " ,w__ " -s Grand Ave., MilwHitkee. and Harper Bi-os., Chica" 1 i o, III , samples of Amliews' Pearl aud Roy ui Bak T1 I I njr Powderg. The cans were in good conditlon U I "hen received and thesenis unbroken. I lind upon - -_ I3 I ¦ analysis that Andiews Pearl Baking Powder C"n- B i '8 H f'-'ins about four iind n hal fl1.,) per cent. more I I fi I f ri'iiin lanar than the Roynl Bakinji Powder, K lul I :llltl rt IrOoriio alfly largvr ercenlai V-. a et o a'boiii(' acid iras, and i fini i to be ¦ l'roe I'rom aluin, and any Injnrloug niiI¦ Manee. I . HE Sinccrcly yours, . PETER COLLIER, SS PP" tBSSB U. S. Chemist, Dept. of Agriculmre. ¦ ¦ Government Cnemist Collier's Anslysis as toMeaveini Qnalities. ANDREWS' PEARllUÊÊÊBÊnÊÊÈÊÊÊÊBBBBUÊÊÊÊUBi roy al IBBRaHHBBB Xo wonder tlie Royal C. omitted Andrews' Pearl from their " Comparntlve List," as Chirprnment Ciietniot Collier's analyslg rIiows i-.onclu'ively two iliings lat, That Andrew-' Pearl ennhiliis worv rcaiii Tarlar than the Royal, as stio hy the cuts abnve; 2d. That the Leavenlng Power of Andrews' Pearl is sfreaier than tlie Royal, ns shown by the two black lines above. CHALLENGE, We wil] sve the Royal Co. or any one else $1.000 or $.. 000 if they can prove by any fair mutual test that Andrews' Pearl Baking Powder does, or ever did, contain aliim or any injnrious substances, and this challenge U Oeu forevei'. Andrews' Pearl Baking Powder is sustained by a testimonial as to its purily and Utren gril by the only ifeiiuiiie commis-ioued Government chemist, sueh is the Royal Co. never have published. Try It. C. E. ASDREWS & CO., 287, 289 & 201 E. Water St., Milwaukee. 45 Michigan Ave., Chicago.