Baking Powder Figures

THATDONTLIEUí The Royal Baking Powder Co. try to give the Inferenee that their povvder i tuin more Team Tai-lar and thiit lts l,ea ening l'ower Is greter than any niher mmle, itt stated In tlteir advertisement on the " Comparative Worth nf Powders," exliibited by black Unes. Our nirae was mentioned in connection witti oneof our clie.-iper bramte, made of different material asthe trade niight (leniHRd. Our Cream Tariar brand of Andrew't l'earl whs omitted. evidently for a rery jcoad reason. jiiilsrinjr from Míe rcliiliu' mt-rils of Andukw's Pkarl" and Rnyitl, ík cle.uly dem.,nstrated by tlie Goverument Chemlat, Dr. Peter Com.ikr of llie Department of Agrirulture, at Washington, from samples eceived by liini from dealers wlio fiirnislit-d tlie samples from tlieir stocks 011 i.aiul in open in,u ket. win cxcp8 of CreamTarKrIn Andrews T n Ofll I ICDC' A IÜ A I VOIO Perl ovor Royl. ncerwlned by öovMK 1,11 ItllO ANALlO h cromeni Chrmlat Collier. l#lli UWbblkllV niinLIWIU X f s. U.S. DIPT OF AOÜICULTURI. I j - Washixotox D. C, March lu, 18SS. ( C. E. Andrews & Co.- Gentlemen : I received by expres from 'Vhae. Lydon and J. P. H:irkins&Co., - 0 ," a (irand Ave, Mlw:mkee. and Harper Bros., CliicaLl SktBMji ' " SMI"l'le8 "f Andrews' Pt-art and Royil BakT S I inr Powders. Tlie cans were in good condition ¦" I I vü-n received av.d tbewiili unbroken. I find upon Bs & I B analysií tbat Andicws Peiirl Baking Powcicr con ¦ I ¦ B mIioiiI f oiir ;md :i i i ; 1 1 (l') per cent, inore O ¦ 11 ¦ '¦''lli lurllir than Mtv H"V" -U;..K P. im, CL B Ull I ¦'"¦ largor percentage ¦ ol' curbonlc aeld gas, and ¦ fl"t it to Ite ¦ IVe Irom aluin, and auy injnrioii uiiI MaiK'f, I I Slncerely yoiir, I I PETER COLUER, I Q IIP l lp U. S. Chemist, Dept. of Agricuhure. Government Cheuiist Collier's Analysis as to the Leavening; Qnalities. andrews' PEARLlHBBBHBHIHBHH&HHSHaB ROYAL MBB&BHHHI No wonder tlie Royal Co. omitted Andrews" Peatl from their " Comparative List," as Government Cliemist Collier's HiialyKis shows conclusively two tbings: Ut, That Andrewo' Pearl contains more Creum Tartar tban tlie Royal, hs ihown hy the cuts above; 2d, Tliat the Leavening Power of Andrews' Pearl ls greater than tlie Royal, as shown by the two black Unes above. CHALLENGE. We will psve the Royal Co. or any one else $1.000 or $5,000 if tliey can prove by any fair mutual test that'Andrews' Pearl Baking Powder does, or ever did, contain aliim or any Ii4ht1oim uitwtnuces, and this challenge is open forever. Andrews Pearl Bakiujf Powder Is snotained by h testimonial as to itspnriiyana mi eiigiii by tlie only o-enuine commis-ioned Government cheinist, such as the Royal Co. never h.re publtahed. Tbt It. AXDREWS & co 287, 289 & 291 E. Water St.. Mihvaukee. 45 Michigan Ave., Chicago.