What A Candidate!

ne ueuolyer case isaverv simóle róvfM'r11 " ;s si"aii-v Srrr Garfleldwas chaman of the commit tee on appropriationB. The contraetors were interested in pr,,curillíí(il(, ; of au appropriation tn a ceWn object Stranmra to Mr. Garfleld, tl ey ■ , : foacfied hlm throWh a third party a, d Hired him for what? As to thcir miwnc í.- ..... : ..- „„ ..tu iiH-.il „„TT i ' , , ? """ W tnerecannot be the slightest doubt. In thejr etters to each other they boasted 'of having bpught the man Who eld tl e I puree Btrings of the nation. As tor iS twere concerned, the $5,000 we,,' a Mr. Garfleld cliocxses to take a differ yu.uont. nesays.hwlheh: Ij earned the $6,000 by renderiiwr lpi s-n ires to the OMtncioïittÏÏÏeS Pá a brief; tbat the $5,000 wenlíll The apprppriation whih the contrae'■oniniitlpf' of -i.ii. ... ...''." llie Theintentionsof theSto "'"rmnmli.she.l. Tlle-V reeoivëd f -om action, wera to eam the s,5 ooo wëre never rendeied by lam. ïheeisroA clusi ve evidence tlmt he nerer madew Wraent for l.is clients; í.o h fman